According to Deborah Baxley, principal for cards and payments at Capgemini Financial Services, an estimated 25 percent of debit cards are expected to be ready -- compared to about 75 percent of credit cards.
The reason is that the U.S. debit card system works differently than anywhere else in the world, she said, and it took longer than expected to come up with specifications.
"The industry had to come up with a solution for the unique requirements of the U.S. debit card system," she said. "And to comply with some recent regulations that were part of the Dodd Frank financial reform act, which requires debit cards to have a choice of routing to different debit networks."
According to Baxley, there are about 30 different debit networks in the country.
The specifications finally came out about a year ago, and banks began issuing new cards.
"We expect them to ramp up quickly," she said.
The advantage to banks is that if, say, the bank has issued a chip card but a merchant hasn't yet upgraded their system to handle these cards, and the card turns out to be fraudulent, then the merchant will be liable for the full amount of the fraud.
Currently, the bank is liable. By migrating to the new chip-based cards before the merchants do, the banks stand to save some money -- at least, until the merchants catch up and the liability shifts back to the bank again.
"The bank can avoid those fraud losses by being faster," she said.
But it's not just about missing out on potential savings, Baxley warned.
As more and more banks send out new, chip-based cards to their customers, criminals will have fewer and fewer targets to go after. The banks that lag behind will then become increasingly more tempting targets.
Once both the bank and the merchant have migrated, thieves with lists of credit card numbers from incidents like the Target data breach will have a harder time using them.
If a criminals takes a stolen credit card number and uses it to create a counterfeit card, then tries to use the card to buy something, a new point-of-sale system would be able to recognize it as a card that was supposed to have a chip in it.
"If it doesn't see a chip, then the transaction would fail," Baxley said. "That's what's supposed to happen."
The chip alone isn't a silver bullet, she added. Merchants should also use tokenization and end-to-end encryption to fully protect the payment information as it travels from the physical payment terminals all the way to the issuers.
Judging by the experience of other countries, once everyone upgrades, the criminals move to the online channel, and to cross-border transactions, she said.
The move to chip-based cards, also known as EMV for Europay Mastercard Visa, is scheduled to happen next month, but the cybercriminals aren't likely to react overnight.
"It's going to be gradual," she said. "It's not like a switch flips on October 1 and the world ends."