A blockchain is the structure of data that represents a financial ledger entry, or a record of a transaction. Each transaction is digitally signed to ensure its authenticity and that no one tampers with it, so the ledger itself and the existing transactions within it are assumed to be of high integrity.
The real magic comes, however, from these digital ledger entries being distributed among a deployment or infrastructure. These additional nodes and layers in the infrastructure serve the purpose of providing a consensus about the state of a transaction at any given second; they all have copies of the existing authenticated ledger distributed amongst them.
When a new transaction or an edit to an existing transaction comes in, generally a majority of the nodes within a blockchain implementation must execute some algorithms and essentially evaluate and verify the history of the individual blockchain block that is proposed, and come to a consensus that the history and signature is valid, then the new transaction is accepted into the ledger and a new block is added to the chain of transactions. If a majority of nodes do not concede to the addition or modification of the ledger entry, then it is denied and not added to the chain. This distributed consensus model is what allows blockchain to run as a distributed ledger without the need for some central, unifying authority saying what transactions are valid and (perhaps more importantly) which ones are not.
In fact, blockchain can be configured to work in a number of ways that use different mechanisms to achieve consensus on transactions and, in particular, to define known participants in the chain and exclude everyone else. The largest example of blockchain in use, Bitcoin, employs an anonymous public ledger in which anyone can participate. For more private uses of blockchain among a smaller number of known actors, many organizations are deploying permissioned blockchains to control who participates in transaction activity.
[Related: Is the blockchain good for security]
Blockchain is attractive to a number of different constituencies for a variety of reasons, including the following:
The biggest problem with blockchain technology now is that it is hard to apply, mainly because, as is typical with open source projects, there are numerous projects each with their own teams and ideals. Marrying all of the functionality into a practical application is difficult. “The only thing that gives me pause about Blockchain is the community that builds the code,” says Matt Reynolds, blockchain application development expert. “Bitcoin is open source, but the team that manages it do not behave in the way you’d ideally like FOSS maintainers to maintain. They behave more like an ‘answerable to no one’ proprietary software team, and that’s not good for anyone using Bitcoin’s Blockchain implementation in their own projects.”
Hyperledger is a project that tries to unify all of the different open source blockchain approaches that exist currently. The goal According to the official Hyperledger website, “the project is building a general-purpose blockchain framework that can be used across industry sectors, from financial services to retail to manufacturing and more.”
What is significant about this project compared to the various and sundry other open source projects that litter the Internet is the industry participation and big names behind this: according to the project, founding members of the initiative include ABN AMRO, Accenture, ANZ Bank, Blockchain, BNY Mellon, Calastone, Cisco, CLS, CME Group, ConsenSys, Credits, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), Deutsche Börse Group, Digital Asset Holdings, Fujitsu Limited, Guardtime, Hitachi, IBM, Intel, IntellectEU, J.P. Morgan, NEC, NTT DATA, R3, Red Hat, State Street, SWIFT, Symbiont, VMware and Wells Fargo.
Hyperledger’s current goals are to combine three projects into practical blockchain applications:
[Related: Open source unleashes blockchain's enterprise potential]
Technology industry giant IBM agrees: it is contributing tens of thousands of lines of code to the Hyperledger project while also being clear that it believes that open technology is the best way to create a truly applicable implementation of blockchain to today’s business and enterprise market. In fact, IBM sees blockchain and ledger technology as making the Internet more aware of commerce.
“As a broad, open initiative inclusive of many different blockchain experts, the Hyperledger Project will advance the open blockchain standard for uses across many industries,” says Jerry Cuomo, vice president blockchain, IBM. “By focusing on an open platform, there’s no limit to the types of applications and frameworks that will one day be built on top of it.”
Of course there are practical limits to this. “The problem with practical applications to Blockchain is that it’s quite hard to find projects that are genuinely good fits,” says Reynolds. “There’s a lot of ‘I have a hammer, so this must be a nail’ thinking around Blockchain. It’s best suited for scenarios where the data itself is public, but that you don’t want to have to explicit give trust to entities to update the data. Regulatory or public applications tend to fit well into this.”
With that said, there is clearly a place for building a foundation for distributed ledger-based ecommerce in the Internet landscape today. In a keynote at The Block Chain Conference in San Francisco in February, IBM’s Global Blockchain Offering Director John Wolpert says, “You need a fabric that allows for lots of competition on platforms and huge competition on solutions. We need to evolve the Internet to become economically aware and this Internet is not going to be an application, it will be a fabric.” And he sees Hyperledger as the project that’s putting the best of breed technologies together to build this fabric.